If you have difficulty in submitting comments on draft standards you can use a commenting template and email it to admin.start@bsigroup.com. The commenting template can be found here.
This part of IEC 61508, which is a Technical Report, makes a proposal as to which topics to consider and which methods and techniques to use when designing object-oriented software to ensure suitable quality for use in functional safety applications.
Object-oriented languages are perceived as "state-of-the-art" nowadays. Such languages seem to be excluded from use by several statements in IEC 61508-3. However there are additions in some tables such as in IEC 61508-3:2010, Table B.1, where notes are added under which their use might be justified. Such exceptions that would allow, for example, dynamic objects, name the main concerns such as memory allocation and predictable timing issues and guide the user to safe use of object-oriented languages. These considerations are taken up in this document to specify methods and techniques that allow the reduction of systematic faults to the levels required by the respective systematic capabilities.
This document is not intended to replace any part of IEC 61508-3. Rules that exist in IEC 61508-3 are valid here as well and are not repeated, including rules that concern:
• the software life cycle,
• involvement of the assessor,
• modularization,
• principle of information hiding,
• proving and conventional testing,
• basic aspects of documentation,
• low coupling and high cohesion,
• responsibilities and training of people,
• operational experience as described in IEC 61508-4 and IEC 61508-7.
New Work Item Proposal
Required form fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) character.
You are now following this standard. Weekly digest emails will be sent to update you on the following activities:
You can manage your follow preferences from your Account. Please check your mailbox junk folder if you don't receive the weekly email.
You have successfully unsubscribed from weekly updates for this standard.
Comment by: