If you have difficulty in submitting comments on draft standards you can use a commenting template and email it to admin.start@bsigroup.com. The commenting template can be found here.

We use cookies to give you the best experience and to help improve our website

Find out what cookies we use and how to disable them

Adoption of a New Work Item - EN 353-2:2024/A1

Source:
CEN
Committee:
PH/5 - Personal Fall Protection
Categories:
Information management | Standardization. General rules
Comment period start date:
Comment period end date:

Comment by:

Scope

This document specifies requirements, test methods, marking, manufacturer’s instructions and information and packaging for guided type fall arresters including a flexible anchor line forming a single product. This anchor line is attached to an upper anchor point for vertical and inclined applications; for horizontal applications, the anchor point can be located at the user’s foot level. Guided type fall arresters including a flexible anchor line conforming to this document are components of one of the fall arrest systems covered by EN 363:2018. Other types of fall arresters are specified in EN 353-1:2014+A1:2017 or EN 360:2023.

Purpose

Amend dimension 4.1 mm to 16.4 mm in Figure 7 b) so that the thickness is correct for a 4 kg steel test mass. (Comment: this error was noted at the time of formal vote, however, correction was not permitted at that time).

Amend figures 10a) and 11a) to mark arrest distance HAD from the release point above the test edge rather than from the test edge itself. (Comment: this amendment will remove the need to include the connection height of the user (1.5 m) to determine the overall arrest distance and be clearer for the user).

Amend 5.2.1.1 so that it is clear that the entire connection element is subjected to the preloading test not just the energy dissipating element, which is a part of the connection element. Also amend 0,008 s-1 to 0,008 m∙s-1 for the correct unit of metres per second for the rate of stressing.

Amend 5.2.1.2.2 so that it is clear to measure the initial length of the energy dissipating element between its load bearing points.

Amend 5.2.2.2.1 so that it is clear that GTFA is positioned on the flexible line along with the stopper device, should fitting a stopper device be applicable. The option to fit a stopper device aligns with the note below Figure 3.This amendment also removes the need for the GTFA/stopper device to be in contact with the end stop as the intention of this test is not to test the end stop.

Amend title of Figure 3 accordingly. (Comment: testing of the end stop is carried out in 5.4 - Dynamic strength and integrity test). Delete 5.3.2.1 which removes the need to carry out the dynamic performance test on the same sample used in the preloading test. This allows for the performance test to be carried out on a new test sample. Renumber subsequent sub-clauses in 5.3.2 accordingly.

Comment on proposal

Required form fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) character.


Please email further comments to: debbie.stead@bsigroup.com

Follow standard

You are now following this standard. Weekly digest emails will be sent to update you on the following activities:

You can manage your follow preferences from your Account. Please check your mailbox junk folder if you don't receive the weekly email.

Unfollow standard

You have successfully unsubscribed from weekly updates for this standard.

Error