If you have difficulty in submitting comments on draft standards you can use a commenting template and email it to admin.start@bsigroup.com. The commenting template can be found here.
Standards Development
This document specifies a data model to describe crops (considered as plant species or varieties being grown/managed/insured/registered in each area during a given time interval) in the context of agrifood systems. This document covers aspects such as but not limited to:
- Differentiating between cultivated plants and wild vegetation.
- Classification criteria based on usage (e.g. seed corn vs. grain corn vs. corn silage; food, feed, fibre, biofuel, industrial crops).
- Differentiating among parts of the plant being harvested.
- Classification based on management methods (e.g. genetically modified, organic, and conventionally grown crops; irrigated vs dryland).
- Accounting for cultural and regional variations in crop classification and terminology, to support alignment across diverse national and local systems.
Scope includes, but is not limited to, comparing and mapping the proposed model with existing resources in the industry:
- European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) plant list
- National crop lists for trade and regulation - Codex Alimentarius: Food safety-related plant classifications.
- FAO Guidelines: Agricultural and statistical definitions.
- Existing ISO standards on agriculture: Ensuring alignment with ISO standards related to seeds, plant health, and farming practices.
A harmonized definition and data model for “crop” is foundational to achieving interoperability, transparency, and efficiency in global agrifood systems. Currently, the absence of a standardized crop definition leads to ambiguity and misalignment across agricultural production, regulatory policy, trade, and research. This proposal responds directly to sustained demand from stakeholders—spanning government agencies, agribusinesses, trade organizations, and the scientific community—for an authoritative reference standard that enables unambiguous documentation and communication regarding crops.
Stakeholder Pain Points and Opportunities for Gain Creation:
Feedback from national agricultural bodies, regulators, industry, and international trade groups underscores the urgent need for a shared crop definition. Key issues identified include:
- Inconsistent crop classification undermines policy implementation, regulatory compliance, and subsidy allocation.
- Trade partners face inefficiencies and disputes due to divergent national classification criteria, impacting tariffs, phytosanitary measures, and maximum residue level (MRL) enforcement.
- Researchers encounter obstacles in data comparability and meta-analysis due to incompatible definitions across datasets and jurisdictions.
- Agricultural technology providers and advanced producers face integration and configuration challenges due to inconsistent or underspecified crop semantics across platforms, limiting automation, decision support, and the precision of analytics in high-tech farming systems.
Anticipated Benefits:
- Regulatory Alignment: Facilitates harmonized policy, subsidy programs, and regulatory frameworks nationally and internationally.
- Business Value Creation: A common, componentized list of crops will enable better data aggregation across multiple farmers, in turn enabling better product efficacy evaluation and other smart agriculture applications.
- Trade Facilitation: Streamlines classification for import/export, reducing disputes and improving efficiency.
- Scientific Consistency: Supports robust, interoperable research and development of sustainability metrics and climate impact assessments.
- Sustainability: Enables precise reporting for sustainability and environmental performance across diverse cropping systems.
Challenges and Risk Mitigation:
- Alignment with Existing Classifications: The standard will enable explicit mappings to, and help reconcile, major industry and regulatory resources (EPPO, Codex Alimentarius, FAO, national lists), enabling the use of different datasets in solving problems. Establishing and maintaining the mappings will require an ongoing, disciplined effort of the community working with the maintenance agency.
Conclusion:
A unified crop definition standard addresses a foundational gap in agrifood semantics, advancing the interoperability, sustainability, and efficiency of food systems. The work aligns with the global movement toward data-driven agriculture and harmonized regulatory environments, directly supporting international goals for food security, trade, and sustainable development.
You are now following this standard. Weekly digest emails will be sent to update you on the following activities:
You can manage your follow preferences from your Account. Please check your mailbox junk folder if you don't receive the weekly email.
You have successfully unsubscribed from weekly updates for this standard.
Comment on proposal
Required form fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) character.